My response to the question, “Is Jihad driven by an all-pervasive sense of inferiority in the Muslim world?”
September 16, 2007 at 11:16 am 2 comments
I am not convinced that “inferiority” is the problem within the Muslim world, or even that it exists en masse. The sweeping tide of modernity and globalization pushed by a Western ideal should not (and did not, necessarily) create a feeling of inferiority. It highlighted the dissimilarities between two very different cultures, and perhaps emphasized the absurdity of forcing an incompatible construct onto a society with its own history, philosophy, manners, dress, and traditions. Western modernization may have caused the Islamic nations to discern, more clearly than ever, the validity of their own familiar way of life that was being leached from them and replaced with bland Americanism.
It must have been disconcerting to be an older person living in Iran during the Shah’s regime, having been raised with values and customs that were considered outdated and unpopular. Though to our television-framed perception, in the West, the 1979 Iranian revolution looked like a chilling return to medieval religiosity, it must have felt like a reclamation of Islamic identity and nationality to some who remembered the time before the American-loving Shah came to power.
Therefore, I don’t feel that inferiority comes into play. It isn’t surprising to watch Western style governmental institutions fail in a part of the world that has a much longer history and has sustained very different concepts of government than we understand fully. Perhaps a large part of the conflict is our (the West’s) interference and unwelcome application of inappropriate constructs. When did democracy become “right” and everything else “wrong”? It rather seems that a number of throwback colonialist tendencies go unexamined within the foreign policies of even the most visible and globally influential Western nations. We seek to change what we don’t understand, and we are threatened by any entity that won’t absorb our capitalist franchise, and in doing so, of course, become part of our income base.
I’m happy to see a fledgling movement towards responsible, sustainable development that is sensitive to the indigenous cultural environment. It shouldn’t shock us that the entire world doesn’t want to be assimilated into our monopoly; glued to their televisions for the latest oblique instructions on how to live, who to become, while leaving their history, religion, values, and identity in the dust. Who are we to think that we know how to run the world at the expense of the individuals who inhabit it?
Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: .
1.
RR | September 19, 2007 at 4:07 am
You’re pretentious, and you’re not nearly as smart as you think you are.
I might have written you off as just another kid who thinks her Geo-Political thoughts somehow matter–but you mention thesis and Ph.D, and I couldn’t just let you slide.
“incompatible construct”, “application of inappropriate constructs”?
You’ve confused “important-sounding words” with “communication.”
You might consider trying to communicate instead of trying to sound smart–you only sound smart to people who aren’t.
When did democracy become “right” and everything else “wrong”?
Really? Did I stumble upon a humor blog?
If you believe the Founding Fathers, then Democracy has always been right (good, correct, moral), as it has always been an unalienable right (“that which is due to anyone by just claim, legal guarantees, moral principles”) possessed by all humans.
Are the Founding Fathers making fun of your absurd question with the words “We hold these truths to be self-evident?”
Democracy is so obvious, it doesn’t even require argument.
Do you really need someone to prove that the sun is bright?
Under direct threat of death, when a higher percentage of Iraqi’s (and Afghani’s) voted than in a recent American Presidential election, I guess that must have been “the West’s . . . unwelcome application of inappropriate constructs” you speak of.
They proudly held up their ink-stained fingers to worldwide cameras to show us how unhappy they are with the inappropriate construct–Democracy–as if to say “F-YOU America, you and your ideas about Democracy!”
Democracy seems to be obvious to everyone in the world except two groups I’ve identified: Rulers in non-Democratic governments, and Dumb Westerners.
The biggest group of people who don’t comprehend freedom are those with too much of it.
You’re a hypocrite, and you don’t have the slightest idea what I mean.
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/declaration_transcript.html
2.
bird | September 19, 2007 at 6:21 am
Thanks for your comment!!! Awesome.
You brought something to my attention – in fact, “a higher percentage of Iraqi’s (and Afghani’s)” can use apostrophes better than ‘Merikens.
Thanks,
Sarah
P.S. Oh, and now I’m really just dying to know…just how bright is the sun? That’s the best argument for democracy EVER. Maybe we should first define our terms. Let’s start with “bright”.